Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Commercial law [2022] JRC 216

Monteagle International Limited and Anor v Grocery Market Research Limited and Ors

Monteagle International Limited and Anor v Grocery Market Research Limited and Ors [2022] JRC 216 (14 October 2022)

The Jersey Royal Court dismissed a challenge to joinder and service out, holding that MCG and Southern 2 were proper parties and Jersey was the suitable forum.

  • Joinder of parties
  • Service out of jurisdiction
  • Breach of contract
  • Misuse of confidential information
  • Shareholding disputes
  • Service-out-of-jurisdiction
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2014] JRC 071

Nautech -v- CSS Ltd, Dunning, Coleman, Inns, Gollop, Maywal Ltd, Warpole and Murch

Nautech -v- CSS Ltd, Dunning, Coleman, Inns, Gollop, Maywal Ltd, Warpole and Murch [2014] JRC 071 (20 March 2014)

The Royal Court of Jersey refused to set aside service out on English defendants, finding a serious issue to be tried in tort claims and proper joinder.

  • Service out of jurisdiction
  • Anton piller orders
  • Interim injunctions
  • Misuse of confidential information
  • Breach of contract
  • Copyright infringement
Read case analysis
Intellectual property

Pell Frischmann v Bow Valley

Pell Frischmann v Bow Valley [2007] JLR_Note 38 (31 May 2007)

A Jersey Law Reports note on alleged misuse of confidential information in an intellectual property dispute between Pell Frischmann and Bow Valley.

  • Confidential information
  • Misuse of confidential information
  • Intellectual-property
  • Confidential-information
  • Misuse-of-confidential-information
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2007] JCA 073

Trant v AG and Others

Trant v AG and Others [2007] JCA 073 (22 March 2007)

Court of Appeal struck out the amended Order of Justice, holding the appellants had not shown they were misled into giving statements and could not pre-emptively claim self-incrimination privilege.

  • Privilege against self-incrimination
  • Misuse of confidential information
  • Abuse of process
  • Judicial review
  • Disclosure of evidence
  • Jurisdiction
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.