Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Richardson v The Minister for the Environment and James 04-Nov-2020 [2020] JRC 232A (04 November 2020)
The Royal Court held it had jurisdiction to award costs in a planning appeal out of time, but exercised its discretion to make no order as to costs.
Carter v Planning Min. [2014] 1 JLR_Note 4 (19 November 2013)
Planning appeal concerning whether retrospective planning permission should be granted. The report note records the dispute and the legal issue raised.
JK Limited -v- Minister for Planning [2012] JRC 193 (22 October 2012)
The Royal Court refused costs after a planning appeal, finding no exceptional circumstances under the modified procedure and no basis to penalize either party.
Le Boutillier v Min for Planning and Environment [2012] JRC 095 (11 May 2012)
The Royal Court of Jersey held that a fair-minded observer might perceive bias from a Jurat’s family connection to an objecting body, so the appeal would be reheard.
JK Limited -v- Minister for Planning [2011] JRC 173B (31 August 2011)
The Royal Court refused most directions sought in a planning appeal, declining personal affidavit and wide disclosure requests, but ordered a further affidavit on delay.
JK Ltd -v- Minister for Planning [2011] JRC 169 (31 August 2011)
The Royal Court refused most directions sought in a planning appeal, but ordered a further affidavit explaining processing delays and the documentary record.
JK Ltd -v- Minister for Planning [2011] JRC 160A (16 August 2011)
The Royal Court dismissed an appeal against a procedural ruling, holding that a planning appeal should proceed under the modified procedure and could be revisited later if oral evidence became necessary.
1998/189 - Towerocque Ltd v Planning and Environment Committee [1998] UR 189 (15 September 1998)
The court refused to strike out a planning appeal, finding no clear concession to comply with the enforcement notice and noting the notice appeared uncertain.
Explore more
