Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Neville v Bray and Ors (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Mowschenson : Planning) [2025] JRC 139 (23 May 2025)
The Jersey Royal Court dismissed a misfeasance in public office claim arising from planning enforcement and prosecution over unauthorized window replacements.
Brigham Young, Sovereign Hire Cars v Minister for Environment [2023] JRC 147 (14 August 2023)
The Royal Court dismissed a planning appeal over a proposed car park in St Helier, holding that the scheme was a change of use and not irrationally refused.
W. E. (Jersey) Limited v Minister for the Environment [2022] JRC 160 (08 August 2022)
The Royal Court set aside the Minister’s call-in of planning applications for a public inquiry, holding that the reasons did not satisfy Article 12(1)(a) of the Planning Law.
WE (Jersey) Limited v Minister for Environment [2022] JRC 044 (18 February 2022)
The Royal Court granted WE (Jersey) Limited leave to seek judicial review of a ministerial decision calling planning applications in for public inquiry.
Sutton v The Connetable of St Brelade [2021] JRC 173 (15 June 2021)
Interim mandatory relief was refused in a judicial review over kiosk trading and a parish car park, because the balance of convenience favoured allowing development to continue.
Shinzo (jersey) Limited v. Minister For The Environment [2020] 2 JLR_Note 6 (09 November 2020)
Judicial review concerning whether the Minister for the Environment lawfully dealt with planning permission under the Planning and Building (Jersey) Law 2002.
The Licensing Assembly adjourned Terre D’Italia Limited’s liquor licence application pending planning approval and further statutory compliance.
Therin -v- Minister for Planning and Warwick [2018] JRC 098 (01 June 2018)
The Royal Court remitted a planning appeal for reconsideration, finding no error in heritage, landscape, biodiversity, or Article 6 analysis, but a failure to apply policy GD1 properly.
Whitworth -v- Minister for Planning and Environment [2015] JRC 189 (15 September 2015)
Third-party planning appeal allowed: the Royal Court held there was no sufficient justification to depart from Green Zone policy and quashed permission, except for a fence extension.
Bougeard -v- Minister for Planning and Environment [2015] JRC 176 (26 August 2015)
Third-party planning appeal over a Green Zone extension was dismissed. The court held the Minister’s grant of permission was not unreasonable.
Explore more
