Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against refusal to set aside registration of an English costs judgment, rejecting fraud, public policy and stay arguments.
Bates v Weston [2023] JRC 060 (19 April 2023)
The Royal Court ordered Mr Weston to pay 90% of Mr Bates’ costs on the standard basis after rejecting indemnity and wasted-costs arguments, with a 10% deduction for the Monaco costs issue.
Bates v Weston [2023] JRC 032 (17 January 2023)
The Jersey Royal Court refused to set aside registration of an English costs judgment against Mr Weston, rejecting public policy, fraud, vesting, and natural justice challenges.
Bates -v- Weston [2018] JRC 006 (10 January 2018)
The court allowed Mr Weston’s appeal for security for costs, but only partially allowed Mr Bates’ appeal, restricting discovery to limited engagement documents.
In re Hardwick v [1995] JLR 245 (31 July 1995)
The Jersey court refused registration of an English county court judgment, holding it was not a judgment of a “superior court” under the 1960 reciprocal enforcement law.
In the matter of the judgements (Reciprocal Enforcement) (Jersey) Law 1960 and Others [1995] JRC 048 (09 March 1995)
A Jersey judgment addressing enforcement of foreign judgments under the Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) (Jersey) Law 1960.
In re Bell v [1995] JLR 23 (16 February 1995)
The court held that a foreign summary judgment may be registered in Jersey if it is conclusive of the parties’ rights, even while an appeal is pending.
In the Matter of the Judgements (Reciprocal Enforcement) (Jersey) Law 1960 [1994] JRC 175 (17 May 1994)
Application to register and enforce a foreign judgment in Jersey under the Judgements (Reciprocal Enforcement) (Jersey) Law 1960 was granted.
E.D. & F. Man (Sugar) Ltd. v Haryanto [1990] JLR 169 (02 August 1990)
The Jersey court held it had a broader power to extend time for setting aside registration of a foreign judgment under the Royal Court Rules or inherent jurisdiction.
Explore more
