Sinel and Chiddicks -v- AG
Sinel and Chiddicks -v- AG [2015] JCA 192 (07 October 2015)
The Court of Appeal upheld findings that two advocates deliberately misled it by not disclosing a protective writ, but reduced one sanction from suspension to a public reprimand.
- Misleading the court
- Duty to court vs duty to client
- Sanctions for professional misconduct
- Professional-discipline
- Legal-ethics
- Misleading-the-court