Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Pender v GGH (Jersey) Limited and Ors [2022] JRC 122 (07 June 2022)
The court held that the plaintiff could rely on a disclosed Fox Williams email, found no obvious mistake barring use, and addressed whether fairness required further discovery.
The Court of Appeal refused permission to appeal to the JCPC in this interlocutory privilege dispute, holding that no point of general public importance arose.
Deripaska v Chernukhin and Navigator Equities Limited [2021] JCA 206 (31 August 2021)
The Court of Appeal held that privilege was not irretrievably waived by affidavits served before trial and allowed amended affidavits removing privileged references.
Chernukhin and Anor v Deripaska and Anor 24-Mar-2021 [2021] JRC 084 (24 March 2021)
The Jersey Royal Court ordered costs in the cause on several interlocutory summonses, including amendments, further information, and privilege-related applications.
Chernukhin and Anor v Deripaska and Anor 11-Feb-2021 [2021] JRC 039 (11 February 2021)
The Royal Court ruled on amendment, privilege, wasted costs, and further information applications in pre-trial proceedings, allowing some requests and refusing others.
Crociani -v- Crociani [2016] JRC 111 (30 June 2016)
The court partly granted plaintiffs’ specific discovery application, ordering disclosure of certain legal advice before the Agate Appointment on waiver of privilege grounds.
Crociani -v- Crociani [2015] JRC 145 (01 July 2015)
The court refused disclosure of legal advice said to be referred to in affidavit evidence and correspondence, finding no waiver of privilege, but ordered limited disclosure of timing.
Cafe de Lecq -v- Rossborough [2011] JRC 067 (29 March 2011)
The court held document 135 was privileged, but its mistaken disclosure was not an obvious error to the receiving lawyers, so no injunction was granted.
Cunningham v Cunningham [2010] JLR_Note 24 (13 April 2010)
A Jersey Law Reports note concerning whether advocate-client professional privilege had been waived in interlocutory civil proceedings.
Cunningham -v- Cunningham [2010] JRC 074 (13 April 2010)
Interlocutory trust dispute on whether a former solicitor could be authorised to give evidence despite legal professional privilege.
Explore more
