Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Royal Court refused Jakob Mahoney’s application to extend time to appeal his sentence and convictions, finding no realistic prospect of success.
Mahoney v AG (Royal Court : Hearing (Criminal) : Temple) [2026] JRC 098 (16 April 2026)
The Royal Court refused an extension of time to appeal conviction and sentence, finding minimal merit in the proposed appeal and no exceptional grounds after guilty pleas.
Da SIlva v AG (Royal Court : Hearing (Criminal) : Binnington) [2026] JRC 022 (21 January 2026)
The Royal Court set aside and then reimposed a 10-month sentence for grave and criminal assault, holding the Magistrate had wrongly treated sentencing policy as binding.
James v AG (Royal Court : Appeal (Criminal) : Bailhache, W) [2025] JRC 324 (5 December 2025)
The Royal Court refused an out-of-time criminal appeal from a guilty plea for common assault, finding no arguable basis to challenge conviction or sentence.
Steenson v AG (Royal Court : Hearing (Criminal) : Le Cocq) [2025] JRC 224 (16 September 2025)
The Royal Court of Jersey dismissed David Samuel Steenson’s sentence appeal, holding that a seven-month prison term for drink driving and dangerous driving was not manifestly excessive.
AG v Tremarco (Court of Appeal : Appeal (Criminal)) [2025] JCA 093 (4 April 2025)
The Jersey Court of Appeal allowed the Attorney General’s sentence reference, finding a community service order for repeated domestic violence and strangulation was unduly lenient.
Gomes v AG [2024] JRC 205 (04 October 2024)
Appeal dismissed against a 6-month driving disqualification and ÂŁ2,000 fine for causing serious injury by careless driving. The court held the sentence was not manifestly excessive.
Turner v AG [2023] JRC 207 (07 November 2023)
The Royal Court dismissed a sentence appeal for careless driving, upholding a ÂŁ5,000 fine and 12-month disqualification as neither manifestly excessive nor wrong in principle.
Carys Ann Ingram v AG [2022] JRC 142 (29 June 2022)
Appeal against sentence for breaches of Jersey Covid-19 regulations partially succeeded; the fine for Regulation 8 was reduced to ÂŁ5,000, with the Regulation 4 fine left unchanged.
Arthur v AG [2018] JCA 217 (28 November 2018)
The Court of Appeal granted leave but dismissed Richard Arthur’s appeal against a seven-year fraud sentence, holding the sentence was not manifestly excessive.
Explore more
