Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family-law

Z v. Y

Z v. Y [2015] 1 JLR_Note 6 (02 December 2014)

Family law note on financial provision and whether financial misconduct should affect the court’s assessment between the parties.

  • Financial-provision
  • Conduct-of-parties
  • Financial-misconduct
  • Family-law
Read case analysis
Family-law

J v H

J v H [2014] 2 JLR_Note 11 (09 July 2014)

Family law note on financial provision, addressing how the conduct of the parties may be relevant when determining financial orders.

  • Financial-provision
  • Conduct-of-parties
  • Family-law
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2014] JRC 113B

AG -v- X

AG -v- X [2014] JRC 113B (15 May 2014)

Post-trial costs application refused after conviction on an alternative count and acquittal on others, with the court considering plea negotiations, defence conduct, and child-witness handling.

  • Costs-in-criminal-proceedings
  • Exercise-of-judicial-discretion
  • Conduct-of-parties
  • Acquittal-and-conviction-on-alternative-counts
  • Child-witness-handling
  • Criminal-costs
Read case analysis
Family-law [1981] JLR 133

H. v W.

H. v W. [1981] JLR 133 (15 September 1981)

Family law case on financial provision, where adultery, desertion, and neglect of teenage children were treated as conduct justifying reduction.

  • Financial-provision
  • Conduct-of-parties
  • Adultery
  • Desertion
  • Neglect-of-children
  • Family-law
Read case analysis
Family-law [1976] JJ 383

Elwell v Knight

Elwell v Knight [1976] JJ 383 (11 June 1976)

In this family law case, the court held that adultery did not justify reducing financial provision where it was induced by the other spouse’s neglect of marital sexual responsibilities.

  • Financial-provision
  • Conduct-of-parties
  • Adultery
  • Marital-responsibilities
  • Family-law
Read case analysis
Family-law [1974] JJ 119

Urquhart v Wallace

Urquhart v Wallace [1974] JJ 119 (21 October 1974)

The court held that all conduct by the parties may be considered in financial provision cases, though only rare gross misconduct may justify denying provision entirely.

  • Financial-provision
  • Misconduct
  • Conduct-of-parties
  • Family-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.