Coutts v Frith
Coutts v Frith [2003] JRC 176 (13 October 2003)
The court dismissed an appeal against a costs order, holding it was fair for the Plaintiffs to bear the Defendants’ third-party costs after maintaining a prescribed tort claim.
- Costs of third party proceedings
- Prescription (limitation)
- Striking out claims
- Discretion in costs orders
- Third-party-costs
- Prescription-limitation