Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
AG v Glas (Royal Court : Hearing (Criminal) : MacRae) [2025] JRC 212 (31 July 2025)
The Royal Court refused a late defence application to adduce non-defendant bad character evidence about the complainant in a criminal trial.
AG v Baska [2022] JRC 059 (03 March 2022)
Pre-trial ruling on bad character evidence in a Jersey criminal case. The court admitted limited background evidence for both sides, but excluded broader material as too collateral.
AG v Fernandes 23-Oct-2020 [2020] JRC 223 (23 October 2020)
The Royal Court refused leave to adduce evidence about a complainant’s sexual history and contraceptive prescriptions, holding it fell outside the permitted exceptions.
AG v Hopkins [2018] JRC 168 (11 September 2018)
The Royal Court dismissed an appeal against conviction for holding a telephone while driving, holding that the magistrate was entitled to prefer the officer’s evidence.
Campbell -v- Campbell and Ors [2016] JRC 190 (18 October 2016)
The Jersey Royal Court admitted new documentary evidence after trial but before judgment, finding it relevant and sufficiently significant to be considered in justice.
G -v- H (Matrimonial) [2016] JRC 091 (29 April 2016)
Appeal in ancillary relief mostly failed, but the court ordered interest on the monetary award due to the Petitioner.
in the matter of Freddie and Arthur (No 2) (Care order) [2015] JRC 101 (13 May 2015)
The court refused to appoint a polygraph expert in care proceedings, holding that credibility of ordinary adult witnesses is for the tribunal, and delay would harm the children.
Att. Gen. v Edmond-O'Brien [2006] JLR 133 (22 March 2006)
The Jersey Court of Appeal held that it could not reassess witness credibility on the written record when considering whether a conviction was unsupported by evidence.
Gosselin v All Sports [2004] JLR 74 (28 January 2004)
The court held that materials from a prior criminal prosecution were not admissible as evidence in later civil proceedings on the same facts, though they could be used in cross-examination for credibility if testimony changed materially.
Shales v Jersey Granite & Concrete Co. Ltd. [1967] JJ 755 (13 June 1967)
The Jersey Court of Appeal upheld findings of fact based on witness credibility, stating it should not interfere unless satisfied the findings were wrong.
Explore more
