Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Insolvency [2020] JRC 047

Representation of DP9 Limited

Representation of DP9 Limited [2020] JRC 047 (12 March 2020)

The Royal Court placed SPARC Group Limited en désastre and held it could require the creditor to fund the Viscount’s likely costs in advance under Article 5(2).

  • Declaration en dĂ©sastre
  • Creditor indemnity
  • Court powers under article 5(2)
  • Security for costs
  • Discrimination under echr
  • Insolvency
Read case analysis
Insolvency [2017] JRC 007

Harbour -v- Orb

Harbour -v- Orb [2017] JRC 007 (12 January 2017)

The Jersey Royal Court declared Orb a.r.l. and Dr Gail Cochrane en désastre on Harbour II LP's application, rejecting a late English counterclaim and adjournment request.

  • Declaration en dĂ©sastre
  • Liquidated claim
  • Personal guarantee
  • Creditor remedies
  • Set-off and counterclaim
  • Realisable assets
Read case analysis
Insolvency [2011] JCA 189A

SO Holding v CDS3 and HM Viscount

SO Holding v CDS3 and HM Viscount [2011] JCA 189A (29 September 2011)

The Court of Appeal held that a single known creditor can seek a declaration en désastre if the statutory conditions are met, and administrative burden on the Viscount was not a proper reason to refuse it.

  • Declaration en dĂ©sastre
  • Discretion of court in insolvency
  • Single creditor applications
  • Jurisdiction under bankruptcy (dĂ©sastre) (jersey) law 1990
  • Bankruptcy-desastre
  • Jersey-insolvency
Read case analysis
Insolvency [2011] JRC 102

Representation of Jersey Homes Loans Ltd

Representation of Jersey Homes Loans Ltd [2011] JRC 102 (19 May 2011)

The Court refused a remise des biens, finding no clear equity or good reason to displace a désastre, and declared the debtors en désastre.

  • Remise des biens
  • Declaration en dĂ©sastre
  • Secured creditors
  • Unsecured creditors
  • Asset realisation
  • Remise-des-biens
Read case analysis
Insolvency [2005] JRC 073

Bridgen and Ports Trading Limited

Bridgen and Ports Trading Limited [2005] JRC 073 (02 June 2005)

The Royal Court refused Mr Bridgen’s application to declare Ports Trading Limited en désastre, finding his creditor status uncertain and, in any event, exercising discretion to dismiss it.

  • Declaration en dĂ©sastre
  • Creditor status
  • Shareholder disputes
  • Corporate re-organisation
  • Directors' duties
  • Declaration-en-desastre
Read case analysis
Bankruptcy [2002] JRC 183

re Mr K R Leech v

re Mr K R Leech v [2002] JRC 183 (09 October 2002)

The Jersey Royal Court declared the property of Mr Kevin Ronald Leech en désastre after finding the statutory criteria were met.

  • Declaration en dĂ©sastre
  • Creditor preference
  • Bankruptcy
  • D-sastre
  • Creditor-preference
Read case analysis
Insolvency [1999] UR 131

1999/131 - Midland Ship Repairs

1999/131 - Midland Ship Repairs [1999] UR 131 (22 July 1999)

The court refused a declaration en désastre because the applicant’s debt was subject to a substantial counterclaim, making it insufficiently incontestable.

  • Declaration en dĂ©sastre
  • Liquidated claim
  • Counterclaim
  • Insolvency requirements
  • Declaration-en-desaistre
  • Liquidated-claims
Read case analysis
Insolvency [1999] UR 122

1999/122 - Giles v Forrest

1999/122 - Giles v Forrest [1999] UR 122 (8 July 1999)

The Deputy Bailiff made a declaration en désastre against Cranfield Trust Co Ltd after no agreement was reached on the proposed terms.

  • Declaration en dĂ©sastre
  • Trusts
  • Company law
  • Insolvency
  • Declaration-en-desastre
  • Company-law
Read case analysis
Bankruptcy [1999] UR 106

1999/106 - Giles v Forrest

1999/106 - Giles v Forrest [1999] UR 106 (11 June 1999)

The court held there was sufficient basis for a désastre against Michael Forrest, despite one known creditor and disputed assets, but adjourned for three weeks.

  • DĂ©claration en dĂ©sastre
  • Insolvency
  • Consent order enforcement
  • Asset tracing
  • Bankruptcy
  • Dijon
Read case analysis
Insolvency [1999] UR 88

1999/88 - Representation of Pall Mall Capital Holdings Limited

1999/88 - Representation of Pall Mall Capital Holdings Limited [1999] UR 88 (24 May 1999)

The Royal Court of Jersey refused a declaration en désastre for Pall Mall Capital Holdings Limited, finding the company had no proven realisable assets.

  • Declaration en dĂ©sastre
  • Realisable assets
  • Directors' duties
  • Liquidation process
  • Insolvency
  • Bankruptcy
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.