Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative law [2019] JRC 56B

Prospective Applicant v Chief Officer of the States of Jersey Police

Prospective Applicant v Chief Officer of the States of Jersey Police [2019] JRC 56B (02 April 2019)

Judicial review of a Jersey police no-consent decision: the Court refused broad disclosure, but ordered a further affidavit on the 8 November 2018 review decision.

  • Judicial review
  • Disclosure
  • Duty of candour
  • Money laundering
  • Police powers
  • Anonymity orders
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2017] JRC 088

Haskell v Comptroller of Taxes

Haskell v Comptroller of Taxes [2017] JRC 088 (14 June 2017)

The Royal Court refused a stay in a tax information exchange judicial review, but required the Comptroller to provide fuller disclosure on residence, entity links, and bank-related grounds.

  • Judicial review
  • Exchange of tax information
  • Duty of candour
  • Disclosure
  • Presumption of regularity
  • Tax information exchange agreements (tiea)
Read case analysis
Taxation [2017] 1 JLR 230

Haskell v. Tax Comptroller

Haskell v. Tax Comptroller [2017] 1 JLR 230 (14 June 2017)

On judicial review leave, the court held the Tax Comptroller owed a duty of candour and must disclose relevant facts and reasoning; letters of request are not normally disclosable.

  • Exchange of tax information
  • Duty of candour
  • Disclosure of letters of request
  • Judicial-review
  • Duty-of-candour
  • Taxation
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2015] JRC 104

Larsen and Volaw

Larsen and Volaw [2015] JRC 104 (14 May 2015)

The Royal Court refused to order further disclosure in judicial review challenges to tax information exchange notices, holding the duty of candour was satisfied.

  • Duty of candour
  • Judicial review procedure
  • Tax information exchange
  • Confidentiality of international requests
  • Proportionality
  • Natural justice
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [1995] JLR 190

Mayo Associates v Anagram

Mayo Associates v Anagram [1995] JLR 190 (23 June 1995)

The court discharged a Mareva injunction immediately because the plaintiff failed to explain a serious abuse of an Anton Piller order and breached its duty of candour.

  • Mareva injunction
  • Anton piller order
  • Duty of candour
  • Abuse of process
  • Mareva-injunction
  • Anton-piller-order
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.