Marett v Marett
Marett v Marett [2008] JLR 384 (17 October 2008)
The court held that a consent order for financial provision may be set aside only for a fundamental mistake, misrepresentation, or a supervening event, not mere dissatisfaction.
- Financial provision
- Consent order
- Setting aside orders
- Error of fact
- Misrepresentation
- Supervening event