The Attorney General -v- Roger James Baksa
The Royal Court ruled on disputed sentencing facts after jury conviction, applying Article 50 of the Criminal Procedure (Jersey) Law 2018 to resolve what was proved.
- Grave and criminal assault
- Attempting to pervert the course of justice
- Dispute as to facts upon which sentence is to be passed
- Domestic abuse context
- Evaluation of witness evidence
- Criminal-sentencing