Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Y v W (Matrimonial) [2024] JRC 028 (14 February 2024)
The Royal Court varied child maintenance after a change in the parties’ finances, reduced UU’s monthly support, kept school fees payable, and limited arrears.
L v M (Family) [2023] JRC 211 (31 October 2023)
The Royal Court in Jersey set child periodical payments at a nominal ÂŁ1 per month, ordered shared child expenses, and refused backdated maintenance.
E v F (Family) [2019] JRC 240A (13 December 2019)
The court made further housing and maintenance orders under Schedule 1, allowing staged payment of the original lump sum, extra funds for rent or purchase, and higher maintenance from January 2020.
U v V (Family) [2018] JRC 160 (04 September 2018)
The court adjourned an application to reduce child maintenance, leaving the existing order in place until a planned review, and required both parents to prepare for relocation and work arrangements.
E v F (Family) [2018] JRC 067A (06 April 2018)
Schedule 1 Children (Jersey) Law 2002 case ordering secure housing, maintenance, education and related support for three children of unmarried parents.
A -v- B (Family) [2016] JCA 098 (26 May 2016)
The Court of Appeal held that the definition of “parent” under Jersey law could include a person whose parental status was definitively recognised in Latvia.
P -v- Q (Family) [2014] JRC 146A (22 July 2014)
The court held that Schedule 1 of the Children (Jersey) Law 2002 allows orders transferring or settling Jersey immovable property for a child’s benefit.
P v. Q [2015] 1 JLR 295 (22 July 2014)
Application for financial provision for a child under the Children (Jersey) Law 2002. The court must consider all circumstances, including any parental agreement about jointly owned property.
I -v- J (Family) [2014] JRC 109 (13 May 2014)
The Jersey Royal Court refused to secure child periodical payments against the father’s property or by deposit, but said it would consider security if he defaulted later.
I -v- J (Family) [2013] JRC 156 (05 August 2013)
Schedule 1 financial provision case in which the court found hidden assets, rejected a housing lump sum, and increased maintenance for the child.
Explore more
