Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Trust law [2025] JRC 326

Halabi v Farrow and Ors (Royal Court : Hearing

Halabi v Farrow and Ors (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Thompson : Trust) [2025] JRC 326 (8 December 2025)

Appeal dismissed: the Royal Court upheld strike out and reverse summary judgment, finding the Plaintiff’s fiduciary-duty and dishonest-assistance claims were inadequately pleaded and prescribed.

  • Breach of fiduciary duty
  • Dishonest assistance
  • Strike out applications
  • Summary judgment
  • Pleading requirements
  • Prescription/limitation
Read case analysis
Trust law [2025] JRC 169

Halabi v Farrow and Ors (Royal Court : Hearing

Halabi v Farrow and Ors (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Cadin : Trust) [2025] JRC 169 (25 June 2025)

The Royal Court struck out Halabi’s claims and granted reverse summary judgment, holding that allegations of fiduciary breach and dishonest assistance were not properly pleaded.

  • Breach of fiduciary duty
  • Dishonest assistance
  • Strike out
  • Summary judgment
  • Pleading requirements
  • Prescription
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2021] JRC 160

M B and Services Ltd and Anor v United Co. Rusal Int'l Public Joint Stock Co. 25-May-2021

M B and Services Ltd and Anor v United Co. Rusal Int'l Public Joint Stock Co. 25-May-2021 [2021] JRC 160 (25 May 2021)

On a costs application after a partly successful strike-out hearing, the Royal Court held the defendant was the successful party but reduced its costs by 15%.

  • Costs
  • Strike out applications
  • Pleading requirements
  • Civil-procedure
  • Strike-out
  • Pleading-requirements
Read case analysis
Property law [2019] JRC 092

Sampurna Properties (Jersey) Limited v Blacks Outdoor Retail Limited

Sampurna Properties (Jersey) Limited v Blacks Outdoor Retail Limited [2019] JRC 092 (23 May 2019)

The court ordered a Scott Schedule before discovery in a lease dilapidations dispute, finding the pleadings too bare to define the alleged breaches.

  • Lease obligations
  • Dilapidations
  • Scott schedule
  • Pleading requirements
  • Discovery
  • Scott-schedule
Read case analysis
Contract law [2018] JRC 148

Doran v Dataquill Limited

Doran v Dataquill Limited [2018] JRC 148 (20 August 2018)

The Royal Court refused a strike-out application, but ordered the plaintiff to amend his pleading to set out the material facts and any quantum meruit alternative.

  • Pleading requirements
  • Quantum meruit
  • Strike out applications
  • Limitation periods
  • Estoppel
  • Unjust enrichment
Read case analysis
Trusts [2010] JRC 083

In the matter of the representation of G

In the matter of the representation of G [2010] JRC 083 (21 April 2010)

The Jersey Royal Court dismissed a beneficiary’s discovery application as premature because the trust allegations were not properly pleaded.

  • Trustee discretion
  • Beneficiary rights
  • Discovery
  • Pleading requirements
  • Removal of protector
  • Addition of beneficiaries
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2004] JRC 191

Cannon v Nicol

Cannon v Nicol [2004] JRC 191 (02 November 2004)

The Royal Court refused to strike out a partnership dispute for delay, ordered further particulars on an allegation of conversion, and granted directions to proceed.

  • Striking out actions
  • Extension of time
  • Pleading requirements
  • Conversion
  • Partnership disputes
  • Civil-procedure
Read case analysis
Banking law [2004] JRC 131A

Abellan & Ors -v- Standard Chartered Bank

Abellan & Ors -v- Standard Chartered Bank [2004] JRC 131A (22 July 2004)

The court struck out pleadings alleging knowing assistance because the particulars did not properly allege dishonesty, though discovery obligations remained unchanged.

  • Knowing assistance
  • Dishonest assistance
  • Pleading requirements
  • Discovery obligations
  • Knowing-assistance
  • Dishonest-assistance
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2002] JRC 194D

Morison v Eichner and Conway

Morison v Eichner and Conway [2002] JRC 194D (14 October 2002)

The court partly allowed an amendment to pleadings, permitting deletion of damage heads but refusing late medical allegations and a new rescission basis.

  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Fraudulent misrepresentation
  • Rescission of contract
  • Pleading requirements
  • Amendment-of-pleadings
  • Fraudulent-misrepresentation
Read case analysis
Succession [1974] JJ 147

In re Tomlinson v

In re Tomlinson v [1974] JJ 147 (13 November 1974)

The case concerned procedure for annulling a will of realty and pleading rules, including that only facts in issue must be pleaded, not evidential detail.

  • Pleading requirements
  • Annulment of will
  • Procedure for commencing proceedings
  • Succession
  • Wills
  • Pleading-requirements
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.