Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
AG v Smith & Cochrane (Royal Court : Hearing (Criminal) : Le Cocq : Saisie) [2025] JRC 256 (9 October 2025)
The Royal Court varied a saisie judiciaire to allow Dr Cochrane to transfer the CCBV share to receivers, enabling enforcement of a confiscation order against Mr Smith.
In the matter of saisies judiciaires in respect of the realisable property of Robert Tantular 28-Oct-2019 [2019] JCA 207 (28 October 2019)
The Court of Appeal held that a mortgage assignment was not prevented by the saisies judiciaires over Robert Tantular’s realisable property, and allowed the appeal.
In re Rosenlund [2016] 1 JLR 37 (15 March 2016)
The court held that transferring trust assets from one trustee to another was not an indirect gift under the Proceeds of Crime (Jersey) Law 1999.
Tantular -v- AG [2014] JRC 243 (08 December 2014)
The court held that four post-November 2007 transfers to the Jasmine Investment Trust were gifts caught by Jersey confiscation law, and varied the saisie accordingly.
Tantular-v -AG [2014] JRC 128 (10 June 2014)
The court held that a beneficiary of a discretionary trust is not beneficially entitled to all trust assets for confiscation purposes, though transfers into the trust may still be reachable.
AG -v- Bhojwani [2011] JRC 049 (03 March 2011)
Preliminary confiscation directions in a money-laundering case: no interlocutory appeal, Article 8(2) orders are procedural, and disclosure directions were made.
AG -v- Gaish 5-Dec-2006 [2006] JRC 180 (05 December 2006)
The court granted a confiscation order for £34,470 only, rejecting the Crown’s claim that the defendant had financed imported cannabis purchases.
The 1988 Law v Smale [2003] JRC 099A (19 June 2003)
The Jersey Royal Court increased a confiscation order after finding the defendant’s speedboat was realisable property and the public interest favoured correction of the earlier error.
The Royal Court issued a certificate under Article 10B(2) and increased Mr Smale’s confiscation order after finding the speedboat was realisable property.
Explore more
