Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
P. E. C. v Lesquende Ltd. [2003] JLR 485 (19 September 2003)
The case considers compulsory purchase compensation under the Pointe Gourde principle and holds that “scheme” is broad enough to include related re-zoning if factually linked.
P and E v Lesquende Ltd [2003] JRC 167 (19 September 2003)
The Royal Court held that the Board misdirected itself on whether rezoning could form part of the compulsory purchase scheme under the Point Gourde principle.
P and E v Lesquende [2002] JRC 196 (15 October 2002)
The Royal Court granted a case-stated order on one valuation issue in Lesquende, holding there was an arguable error of law about whether rezoning formed part of the scheme.
Planning Cttee. v Lesquende [1998] JLR 85 (13 February 1998)
Compulsory purchase valuation had to reflect development potential and planning prospect, while ignoring scheme-related value changes, including any re-zoning within the scheme.
1998/33 - Lesquende v Planning and Environment Committee [1998] UR 33 (13 February 1998)
Court of Appeal held that whether rezoning formed part of a compulsory purchase scheme was a factual issue for the Board, not a matter for judicial direction.
Explore more
