Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Commercial-law [2025] JRC 145

OWH SE.i.L v RTI Ltd (Royal Court : Hearing

OWH SE.i.L v RTI Ltd (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Le Cocq) [2025] JRC 145 (28 May 2025)

The Royal Court of Jersey refused to set aside a worldwide freezing and disclosure order made to enforce an arbitral award, finding a real risk of dissipation.

  • Freezing-orders
  • Disclosure-orders
  • Risk-of-dissipation
  • Enforcement-of-arbitral-awards
  • Public-policy-exception
Read case analysis
Matrimonial-law

S and Company J v T

S and Company J v T (Matrimonial)

The Royal Court refused a worldwide freezing order sought by S and Company J against T, finding insufficient evidence of dissipation and inadequate particulars of the claims.

  • Worldwide-freezing-order
  • Risk-of-dissipation
  • Costs-orders
  • Damages-claim
  • Ancillary-financial-proceedings
  • Freezing-injunctions
Read case analysis
Civil-procedure [2021] JRC 276

Between v Geoffrey Crill

Between v Geoffrey Crill [2021] JRC 276 (10 November 2021)

The Royal Court of Jersey refused a freezing and disclosure injunction sought by Hunters Investments Limited, finding insufficient evidence of a real risk of dissipation.

  • Interim-injunctions
  • Freezing-orders
  • Risk-of-dissipation
  • Fraud
  • Misrepresentation
  • Fraud-allegations
Read case analysis
Civil-procedure [2020] JRC 160

Albion Energy Limited v Energy Investments Global Limited and Heritage Oil Limited

Albion Energy Limited v Energy Investments Global Limited and Heritage Oil Limited [2020] JRC 160 (10 August 2020)

The Royal Court held that Practice Direction 15/04 did not strictly apply to a proprietary preservation order over specific shares, and refused to discharge the injunction.

  • Interim-injunctions
  • Freezing-orders
  • Property-preservation
  • Practice-direction-compliance
  • Security-interest-agreement
  • Risk-of-dissipation
Read case analysis
Civil-procedure [2019] JRC 091

Cornish v Brelade Bay Limited

Cornish v Brelade Bay Limited [2019] JRC 091 (21 May 2019)

The Royal Court of Jersey refused a freezing injunction and disclosure orders, finding no sufficient evidence of a real risk that the developer would dissipate assets.

  • Freezing-injunctions
  • Disclosure-orders
  • Risk-of-dissipation
  • Special-purpose-vehicles
  • Material-non-disclosure
  • Balance-of-convenience
Read case analysis
Family-law [2016] JRC 212

Jensen -v- Jensen

Jensen -v- Jensen [2016] JRC 212 (18 November 2016)

The Royal Court of Jersey refused to discharge a matrimonial freezing injunction, finding a real risk of dissipation, but allowed a limited ÂŁ25,000 variation subject to conditions.

  • Freezing-injunction
  • Risk-of-dissipation
  • Asset-disclosure
  • Variation-of-injunction
  • Community-property
  • Matrimonial-property
Read case analysis
Civil-procedure [2006] JRC 034A

UCC -v- Bender 10-Mar-2006

UCC -v- Bender 10-Mar-2006 [2006] JRC 034A (10 March 2006)

The court refused to discharge a freezing injunction, finding no material non-disclosure, a good arguable case, and a real risk of dissipation.

  • Freezing-injunction-(mareva)
  • Full-and-frank-disclosure
  • Risk-of-dissipation
  • Assignment-of-claims
  • Compound-interest
  • Proprietary-and-personal-claims
Read case analysis
Civil-procedure [1998] UR 151

1998/151 - Fuchs v Ekeh and Najam

1998/151 - Fuchs v Ekeh and Najam [1998] UR 151 (13 July 1998)

The Royal Court of Jersey refused to discharge a Mareva injunction, finding sufficient disclosure and a real risk that funds would be dissipated if lifted.

  • Mareva-injunction
  • Freezing-orders
  • Fraudulent-misrepresentation
  • Clean-hands-doctrine
  • Full-and-frank-disclosure
  • Risk-of-dissipation-of-assets
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.