Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Unopposed confiscation and compensation application granted after appeal. The court accepted exceptional circumstances for late listing and ordered ÂŁ210,438.63.
Pearce v AG 29-Apr-2021 [2021] JRC 125 (29 April 2021)
The Royal Court refused bail, directed further disclosure under a saisie judiciaire, and adjourned Pearce’s variation application until he complied.
In the matter of saisies judiciaires in respect of the realisable property of Robert Tantular 28-Oct-2019 [2019] JCA 207 (28 October 2019)
The Court of Appeal held that a mortgage assignment was not prevented by the saisies judiciaires over Robert Tantular’s realisable property, and allowed the appeal.
AG v Arthur [2019] JRC 113 (18 June 2019)
The Royal Court held that exceptional circumstances justified a short postponement of confiscation proceedings and refused to lift or vary the saisie judiciaire.
In the matter of the Saisies Judiciaires of Robert Tantular 18-Jun -2019 [2019] JRC 114 (18 June 2019)
The Royal Court held that the saisies judiciaires prevented Credit Suisse from assigning a mortgage over property subject to restraint, and refused any variation to permit the assignment.
First Trust Management Limited -v- AG [2018] JRC 064 (23 March 2018)
The Royal Court refused First Trust’s application to lift a saisie judiciaire over accounts linked to proceeds of a US forfeiture order against Arnold Bengis.
Viscount of the Royal Court of Jersey -v- AG and Arthur [2017] JCA 052 (29 March 2017)
The Court of Appeal held that the Viscount’s duties under a saisie judiciaire are statutory, not trustee duties, and heard the appeal despite no live lis.
Viscount v. Att. Gen. [2017] 1 JLR 133 (29 March 2017)
The Court of Appeal held it could hear an appeal on a matter of genuine public importance even though there was no longer a live lis between the parties.
Arthur -v- AG and Others [2016] JRC 132 (01 August 2016)
The Court held the Viscount held only Mr Arthur’s joint interest in land under a saisie judiciaire, ordered the sale to proceed jointly, and allowed the hearing to be private.
Arthur v. Att. Gen. [2016] 2 JLR_Note 3 (01 August 2016)
In an interlocutory criminal proceeds-of-crime matter, the court held that the Viscount may sell assets subject to saisie judiciaire.
Explore more
