Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
AG v Withe [2023] JRC 123 (19 July 2023)
After a common assault conviction, the court decided under Article 50 how the defendant should be sentenced, using the Crown case but excluding any reference to a knife.
AG v Baksa [2022] JRC 109 (19 May 2022)
Post-verdict, the court resolved disputed facts for sentencing under Article 50, finding the assault was partly motivated by pregnancy belief and that the complainant was on the floor.
AG v Teixeira 12-Nov-2020 [2020] JRC 239 (12 November 2020)
The Jersey Royal Court held that factual disagreements about how the defendant acquired cocaine were not material to sentence, so the Newton hearing was vacated.
AG v Frescata [2017] JRC 209A (08 December 2017)
After a guilty plea, the court granted bail pending sentencing on strict conditions designed to secure attendance and prevent flight from the Island.
X v AG [2011] JCA 063 (23 March 2011)
The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against a ÂŁ180,000 prosecution costs order, holding the Royal Court had a discretion to award costs and no blameworthy conduct was required.
AG v X [2010] JRC 215 (25 November 2010)
The Jersey Royal Court held that prosecution costs could be adjourned after sentencing and ordered the defendant to pay ÂŁ180,000 in costs.
AG -v- Da Silva [2007] JRC 217 (21 November 2007)
The Royal Court of Jersey refused to exclude the defendant’s interview admissions from a Newton Hearing, finding no significant and substantial breach of the police codes.
Att. Gen. v Carvalho [2007] JLR_Note 15 (18 January 2007)
Note on sentencing procedure in a criminal case, addressing when a Newton hearing is appropriate to resolve disputed facts after a guilty plea.
Ali v Att. Gen. [2005] JLR_Note 11 (24 March 2005)
Note on criminal sentencing procedure concerning whether a Newton hearing was appropriate to resolve factual disputes affecting sentence.
AG v Somerville and Hardman [2004] JRC 184 (22 October 2004)
The court refused to exclude CCTV footage of an assault at sentencing, holding it was proper to view the recording and rely on it along with other mitigation.
Explore more
