Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
O'Hare v Burgher 04-Mar-2021 [2021] JRC 065 (04 March 2021)
The Jersey Royal Court construed a settlement agreement as requiring the defendant to vacate a property within three months, granting summary judgment for the plaintiff.
Abraham -v- Perry [2005] JRC 150A (31 October 2005)
The Royal Court set aside substituted service, finding insufficient evidence that personal service on Mr Perry was impracticable and declining to deem service valid.
Perry v Abraham [2003] JRC 109A (02 July 2003)
The Jersey Royal Court held that a detailed heads of agreement for a HO3B joint venture was binding and ordered specific performance for transfer of shares.
Hamon v Webster [2002] JRC 138 (19 July 2002)
A neighbour dispute over building works and a promised lease ended with the court holding the written agreement, as varied, was binding and the plaintiff failed to finish on time.
Daisy Hill v Rent Control Tribunal [1995] JLR 176 (08 June 1995)
The court held that an advocate’s promise to furnish particulars was not specifically enforceable because a reasonable person would see no intention to create a binding contract.
Felard Invs. Ltd. v Church of Our Lady [1979] JLR 19 (01 February 1979)
The court refused specific performance of an agreement to extinguish a restrictive covenant affecting land, holding the remedy was not appropriate on the facts.
Symes v Couch [1978] JLR 119 (27 July 1978)
The Royal Court applied equitable jurisdiction and part performance to enforce an oral contract for sale, ordering the defendant to implement the agreement.
Romeril v Davis [1977] JLR 135 (13 October 1977)
The court held that without a signed agreement or part performance, no remedy was available for enforcement or damages, and acceptance of a written tender to purchase was not binding.
York Street Pharmacy Ltd. v Rault [1974] JJ 65 (18 July 1974)
The court held that a promesse à l'héritage is not specifically enforceable in Jersey, though it may still support a claim for damages.
Explore more
