Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Halabi v Farrow and Ors (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Thompson : Trust) [2026] JRC 023 (21 January 2026)
The Royal Court refused leave to appeal and a stay after dismissing the appellant’s challenge. The defendants received standard costs and a £25,000 payment on account.
Holmes -v- Lingard and Others [2018] JRC 071B (17 April 2018)
The court dismissed most of Shane Michael Holmes’s appeal, holding there was no sufficiently certain binding agreement with Harry James Lingard in June 2011.
Viera v Kordas [2014] 1 JLR_Note 9 (11 December 2013)
Civil procedure note on whether a pleading should be struck out in Viera v Kordas.
Leeds United v Admatch [2011] JLR_Note 1 (19 January 2011)
Civil procedure note on an application to strike out a pleading, concerning the court’s power to remove claims disclosing no reasonable cause of action or amounting to an abuse of process.
Alhamrani v Alhamrani [2009] JLR 301 (24 July 2009)
In an interlocutory civil procedure dispute, the court held that a pleading should be struck out for fraud or dishonesty only where trial fairness is imperilled.
Alhamrani v Alhamrani [2008] JLR_Note 45 (03 November 2008)
A Jersey civil procedure note concerning an application to strike out pleadings, focused on whether the pleadings disclosed a valid cause of action.
Jersey F.S.C. v A.P. Black Ltd. [2005] JLR_Note 36 (25 August 2005)
Interlocutory civil procedure note on whether pleadings should be struck out for prejudicing, embarrassing, or delaying the fair trial of the action.
In re Esteem Settlement v [2000] JLR 119 (14 April 2000)
The court refused to strike out the pleading, holding that only claims plainly and obviously bound to fail should be removed, especially in developing areas of law.
1900 Trust v Nurnberg [2000] JLR 62 (23 February 2000)
A Jersey civil procedure decision on striking out pleadings for prejudice, embarrassment, or delay, stressing liberal interpretation but caution against easy claims of embarrassment.
In re Sinel v [2000] JLR 18 (27 January 2000)
The court said an application to strike out for delay should be made promptly, and may not be entertained if the delay is a tactical manoeuvre.
Explore more
