Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure

Marange Invs. v la Generale Des Carrieres

Marange Invs. v la Generale Des Carrieres [2013] 2 JLR_Note 21 (19 June 2013)

A Jersey costs note on withdrawal or discontinuance of proceedings, holding that the withdrawing party is generally liable for the other side's costs.

  • Costs
  • Withdrawal of action
  • Discontinuance
  • Civil-procedure
  • Withdrawal-of-action
Read case analysis
Civil procedure

Cotrel v Christmas

Cotrel v Christmas [2013] 2 JLR_Note 3 (24 May 2013)

Costs were determined after the action was withdrawn or discontinued, with the court applying civil procedure discretion on liability for costs.

  • Costs
  • Withdrawal of action
  • Discontinuance of action
  • Civil-procedure
  • Discontinuance-of-action
  • Withdrawal-of-action
Read case analysis
Probate [2006] JRC 170

Gheewala v Compendium 28-Nov-2006

Gheewala v Compendium 28-Nov-2006 [2006] JRC 170 (28 November 2006)

The Royal Court of Jersey ordered withdrawal of a probate dispute after a Kenyan court upheld the 1976 will, awarded costs against the Plaintiff, and revoked letters of administration.

  • Will validity
  • Grant of probate
  • Costs
  • Withdrawal of action
  • Subsequent action inhibition
  • Probate
Read case analysis
Civil procedure

In re Sinel v

In re Sinel v [2000] JLR_Note 19a (30 May 2000)

Costs issue after withdrawal or discontinuance of an action. The note states that costs are determined by the court, usually following the event unless special circumstances apply.

  • Costs
  • Withdrawal of action
  • Discontinuance
  • Civil-procedure
  • Withdrawal-of-action
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [1994] JLR 304

Croxford v Le Claire

Croxford v Le Claire [1994] JLR 304 (22 September 1994)

The court held that an action deemed withdrawn under Royal Court Rules 1992 r.6/20(2) could not be reinstated, and r.1/5 could not be used to extend time.

  • Withdrawal of action
  • Discontinuance
  • Reinstatement of action
  • Royal court rules 1992
  • Civil-procedure
  • Withdrawal-of-action
Read case analysis
Civil procedure

Croxford v Le Claire

Croxford v Le Claire [1994] JLR_Note 5b (06 May 1994)

Civil procedure note on withdrawal or discontinuance of an action, with the matter adjourned sine die.

  • Withdrawal of action
  • Discontinuance
  • Adjournment sine die
  • Civil-procedure
  • Withdrawal-of-action
  • Adjournment-sine-die
Read case analysis
Civil procedure

Dick v Dick

Dick v Dick [1990] JLR_Note 2c (06 April 1990)

A Jersey costs note in Dick v Dick held that indemnity costs were appropriate after withdrawal of the action.

  • Costs
  • Indemnity costs
  • Withdrawal of action
  • Indemnity-costs
  • Withdrawal-of-action
  • Civil-procedure
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.