Ijakaa v Republic
Ijakaa v Republic [2025] KEHC 10518 (KLR)
The court found that the complainant's testimony was clear, credible, and sufficient to sustain a conviction for defilement, even in the absence of corroboration, as corroboration is not a legal requirement in sexual offences if the court finds the testimony truthful. The age of the complainant was adequately proven through the mother's oral testimony and the production of a birth certificate. Any contradictions in the prosecution's evidence were minor and did not go to the root of the case. The sentence imposed was lawful and appropriate under the Sexual Offences Act, and the trial court had…
Source excerpt
- Defilement Of Minor
- Sexual Offences Act
- Corroboration Requirements
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Evidence Of Age
- Contradictions In Testimony