MED v AAD
MED v AAD [2025] KEHC 7247 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to provide sufficient and persuasive reasons for the delay in seeking leave to appeal out of time, as no affidavit evidence was provided to substantiate the claim that the ruling notice was sent to the wrong email. The court emphasized that extension of time is a discretionary remedy requiring a satisfactory explanation for delay, which was not met in this case. Consequently, the applicant was not deserving of the court's discretion to extend time. As the primary prayer failed, the request for stay of proceedings was rendered moot and was also dismiss…
Source excerpt
- Extension Of Time
- Leave To Appeal
- Stay Of Proceedings
- Matrimonial Disputes