John Ngugi Gitau v Attorney General
John Ngugi Gitau v Attorney General [2017] KEHC 1290 (KLR)
The court found that while the plaintiff suffered gunshot injuries and subsequent amputation, he failed to discharge the burden of proof that police officers were responsible for the shooting. The plaintiff did not provide corroborative evidence, such as witness testimony or investigative reports, to establish that the police were the shooters. The medical reports and discharge summaries confirmed the injuries but were not conclusive as to liability. Consequently, the court held that the defendant could not be held liable for the plaintiff's injuries, and the suit was dismissed.
Source excerpt
- Police Shooting
- Personal Injury
- Vicarious Liability
- Burden Of Proof