MNM v PM
MNM v PM [2022] KEHC 13783 (KLR)
The court found that only the Ruiru property, registered in the joint names of the parties and acquired during the marriage, constituted matrimonial property under Section 6 of the Matrimonial Property Act. However, since the respondent had relinquished his interest and executed a transfer in favour of the applicant, the court declined to make any further order regarding this property, advising the applicant to effect the transfer administratively. The Naivasha properties, though acquired during the marriage, were registered solely in the respondent's name, and the applicant failed to prove a…
Source excerpt
- Matrimonial Property
- Division Of Property On Divorce
- Beneficial Interest
- Contribution To Property
- Ownership Of Property
- Trusts In Marital Property