Seipati Ramone V Standard Lesotho Bank & 4 Others (CCT/0517/2024)
Seipati Ramone V Standard Lesotho Bank & 4 Others (CCT/0517/2024) [2025] LSHC 240 (11 September 2025)
The court found that there was no error in making the deed of settlement an order of court, as the applicant had agreed to its terms, including the right of the 1st respondent to execute upon default. The applicant defaulted on the agreed payments, entitling the 1st respondent to execute. The application for rescission was therefore dismissed.
Source excerpt
- Rescission of judgment
- Mortgage enforcement
- Settlement agreements
- Execution of judgments