Chaponda v Blantyre Print and Packing Limited and 6 Others
Chaponda v Blantyre Print and Packing Limited and 6 Others (Civil Cause 55 of 2017) [2022] MWHC 30 (28 February 2022)
The court found that the Defendants published false and defamatory statements about the Claimant with malice, particularly in articles labeling him as 'defiant', 'epitome of decadence', and equating him to Satan. The court held that the defences of fair comment and qualified privilege were not available due to the presence of malice and lack of honest opinion. The publications went beyond responsible journalism and violated the Claimant's right to reputation. The Claimant was defamed and entitled to damages and an apology.
Source excerpt
- Defamation
- Libel
- Freedom of expression
- Qualified privilege
- Fair comment
- Damages