Sign in
Malawi Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Malawi Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Malawi decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law [2022] MWHC 81

R v Banda (Confirmation Case 912 of 2021)

R v Banda (Confirmation Case 912 of 2021) [2022] MWHC 81 (22 April 2022)

On confirmation, the High Court of Malawi enhanced Jane Banda’s sentences for forgery, uttering, false pretences and misuse of an identity card.

  • Forgery
  • Uttering false documents
  • Obtaining credit by false pretences
  • Use of false identity card
  • Sentencing
  • Criminal-law
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2020] MWHC 199

Republic v Mhone and Mvula

Republic v Mhone and Mvula (Criminal Case 18 of 2018) [2020] MWHC 199 (29 November 2020)

The High Court of Malawi convicted Reverend Daniel Mhone and Mlenga Mvula on all counts, including obtaining by false pretences, forgery, uttering false documents and misuse of office.

  • Obtaining by false pretences
  • Forgery
  • Uttering false documents
  • Misuse of public office
  • Obtaining-by-false-pretences
  • Uttering-false-documents
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2008] MWHC 116

R v Betha & Anor. (30 of 2008)

R v Betha & Anor. (30 of 2008) [2008] MWHC 116 (10 June 2008)

The High Court of Malawi dismissed a criminal appeal against convictions for conspiracy, forgery, and uttering false documents, and upheld the sentences.

  • Conspiracy to commit a felony
  • Forgery
  • Uttering false documents
  • Appeal against conviction and sentence
  • Bail
  • Legal representation
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2008] MWHC 113

S v Mwawa (50 of 2006)

S v Mwawa (50 of 2006) [2008] MWHC 113 (8 June 2008)

The High Court of Malawi upheld Yusufu Mwawa’s convictions for abuse of office, theft, forgery and uttering, but reduced and suspended the sentences because of ill health.

  • Abuse of office
  • Theft
  • Forgery
  • Uttering false documents
  • Sentencing
  • Abuse-of-office
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2008] MWHC 206

Kwaramba Cosmas & Anor. v R (16 of 2008)

Kwaramba Cosmas & Anor. v R (16 of 2008) [2008] MWHC 206 (2 June 2008)

The trial magistrate properly considered both mitigating and aggravating factors, and the sentence imposed was lenient given the seriousness and cross-border nature of the offence.

  • False declaration of citizenship
  • False declaration for a passport
  • Uttering false documents
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating and aggravating factors
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2008] MWHC 105

R v Kwaramba & Anor.

R v Kwaramba & Anor. (Criminal Appeal 16 of 2008) [2008] MWHC 105 (2 June 2008)

The trial magistrate gave due consideration to mitigating factors, but the aggravating factors were overwhelming; the sentence imposed was lenient enough and is confirmed.

  • False declaration of citizenship
  • False declaration for a passport
  • Uttering false documents
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating and aggravating factors
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2007] MWSC 470

R v Banda

R v Banda (Criminal Appeal 1 of 2007) [2007] MWSC 470 (11 May 2007)

The Supreme Court of Appeal reinstated Lucius Cricco Banda’s conviction for uttering a false document and giving false information, and varied the sentence.

  • Uttering false documents
  • Giving false information to public officers
  • Admissibility of documentary evidence
  • Right to fair trial
  • Standard of proof
  • Appeals against acquittal
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2007] MWHC 13

R v Manyeka (4 of 2007)

R v Manyeka (4 of 2007) [2007] MWHC 13 (18 March 2007)

The High Court of Malawi allowed a criminal appeal in part, correcting a forgery conviction under the wrong Penal Code section and reducing the related sentences.

  • Forgery
  • Uttering false documents
  • Sentencing
  • Appeal after guilty plea
  • Criminal-law
  • Uttering-false-documents
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2006] MWHC 23

Lucius Chicco Banda v R

Lucius Chicco Banda v R (Criminal Appeal 48 of 2006) [2006] MWHC 23 (6 November 2006)

The High Court of Malawi quashed Lucius Chicco Banda’s convictions for uttering a false document and giving false information, finding the evidence insufficient and the section 122 charge defective.

  • Uttering false documents
  • Giving false information to public officer
  • Admissibility of documentary evidence
  • Fair trial rights
  • Election qualifications
  • Uttering-false-document
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2006] MWHC 141

Banda Lucious v R (48 of 2006)

Banda Lucious v R (48 of 2006) [2006] MWHC 141 (6 November 2006)

High Court appeal in Malawi against convictions for uttering a false document and giving false information to a public officer.

  • Uttering false documents
  • Giving false information to public officer
  • Documentary evidence
  • Fair trial rights
  • Election qualifications
  • Criminal-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Malawi decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.