10 Dec 2020
1. ) Ho Wei Yap 2. ) Chong Choy Yew 1. ) Ho Kim Ling 2. ) Chai Yike Fong
- Citation
- AA-12BNCvC-5-06/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- AA-12BNCvC-5-06/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The High Court affirmed the Sessions Court: plaintiffs proved the SPA, payment of the 10% deposit and the balance via deposit slips and transaction lawyer testimony; defendants' contrary story was unpleaded and therefore inadmissible as justification; remittance evidence (including transfers by a party beyond the seas) was admissible under s73A; there was no basis to draw an adverse inference under s114; appellate interference was unwarranted absent a plainly wrong finding.