Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Malaysia Case Law

Affidavit jurat and interpretation
  • 11 Nov 2025

    UIS BUILDING MATERIALS SDN BHD XIAO XIANHUA

    Citation
    JA-22NCvC-95-07/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
    Court
    High Court
    Case number
    JA-22NCvC-95-07/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

    The court admitted the contested affidavits for the limited interlocutory purpose because independent evidence (an interpreter affidavit) established comprehension for the Defendant's affidavits and no independent proof was provided that the Plaintiff's deponent did not understand the affidavits; both parties raised serious triable issues but the balance of convenience and inadequacy of damages favored preserving the status quo under the Plaintiff's management; accordingly Plaintiff's inter partes injunction was granted and the Defendant's counter‑injunction dismissed.