27 Nov 2025
XXXX ARIFFIN BIN ABDULLAH
- Citation
- 22NCVC-400-08/2014 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- 22NCVC-400-08/2014 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The substituted service order was valid and the default judgment of 25.2.2015 was regularly obtained; the defendant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for over ten years delay and failed to disclose a prima facie meritorious defence (did not deny receipt of deposit, provided no particulars of alleged fraud, and took no action against solicitors alleged to have acted improperly); therefore extension of time and setting aside of the default judgment are refused and the interlocutory application is dismissed with costs.