14 Mar 2025
Baguda (M) Sdn. Bhd. Brady Technology Sdn. Bhd.
- Citation
- PA-22NCvC-183-08/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- PA-22NCvC-183-08/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Plaintiff failed to prove either mutual mistake or actionable misrepresentation as to the Annex Building's built-up area; the evidence showed knowledge and assent by the Plaintiff (approval/signing of submission drawings and tenancy documents, involvement in preparation), therefore the agreements are valid and binding, including the option renewals; accordingly the Plaintiff's claim is dismissed and the Defendant's counterclaim allowed with costs, but specified damages claims in paragraphs 38(h) and (i) were not granted.