24 Feb 2021
BA-24C-4-01/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Citation
- BA-24C-4-01/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- BA-24C-4-01/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Clause 7.1 is not a conditional payment provision within s35 CIPAA; the adjudicator erred in construction and gave weight to the QS certificate but those errors were within the scope of matters referred and did not amount to excess of jurisdiction or denial of natural justice under s15, therefore the setting aside application and stay were refused and leave to enforce under s28 granted.