13 Sept 2022
SETHUPATHI A/L PATHI [ ]
- Citation
- M-05(M)-384-10/2020 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Court
- M
- Case number
- M-05(M)-384-10/2020 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
Convictions were unsafe because material contradictions in prosecution evidence, especially on identification, and lack of proof of common intention under s.34 meant no reliable prima facie case existed to require the appellants to enter defence; trial judge erred in law and fact in calling for defence and in evaluating evidence, therefore convictions set aside and appellants acquitted.