3 Oct 2024
[ ] 1. ) Pavidthren A/l Danaraja 2. ) Mohamad Shahrul Nizam Bin Abdullah 3. ) Arivindren A/l James 4. ) Viknesh A/l Manivannan
- Citation
- BA-45B-10-06/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- BA-45B-10-06/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
After maximum evaluation the prosecution evidence was inadequate to establish a prima facie case against OKT1–OKT6: principal eyewitness (SP10) lacked certainty as to who inflicted fatal wounds, circumstantial chain was incomplete, no forensic linkage of weapons to accused, and material investigative witnesses were not called to clarify gaps. Section 149 was not shown to apply. Accordingly the accused were entitled to acquittal and discharge.