4 Feb 2025
1. ) ABDUL RAZAK BIN ABDUL AZIZ 2. ) SYED SALLEHUDDIN BIN SYED MOHAMAD 3. ) NAGARAJAH A/L SATHASIVAM 4. ) MOHD HARDI BIN MISWAN RAI UTILITY SDN. BHD
- Citation
- BA-16-19-04/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- BA-16-19-04/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Appellants were absent from work for nine months and provided no documentary evidence they rendered services to respondent from January to September 2023; their prolonged absence constituted breach under s15(2) Employment Act 1955, permitting termination without notice under s13(2); therefore the Director General of Labour's decision was correct and the appeal is dismissed.