Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Malaysia Case Law

Counselling order

  • 5 Feb 2026

    ABDUL HOFUR

    Citation
    BC-62JSK-3-01/2026 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
    Court
    Sessions Court
    Case number
    BC-62JSK-3-01/2026 (Mahkamah Sesyen)

    Given the victim's age, the accused's exploitation of a vulnerable child, the seriousness and repeated nature of the offences, and after affording mitigation for the guilty plea, the court found 9 years imprisonment and one stroke per count to be a proportionate sentence; sentences were ordered to run concurrently and ancillary orders under AKSTK ss.26 and 27 were imposed.

  • 5 Feb 2026

    ABDUL HOFUR

    Citation
    BC-62JSK-2-01/2026 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
    Court
    Sessions Court
    Case number
    BC-62JSK-2-01/2026 (Mahkamah Sesyen)

    Court accepted guilty pleas as mitigating but found aggravating factors (victim vulnerability, offender being foreign national, seriousness of repeated offences). Sentences must reflect public interest and deterrence within statutory maxima. Consequently the court convicted and imposed nine years imprisonment and one stroke for each count, to run concurrently, plus counselling during imprisonment under s.26 AKSTK and two years police supervision under s.27 AKSTK.