8 Oct 2024
LOGANAIDU A/L MUNIANDY [ ]
- Citation
- W-05(SH)-356-08/2022 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Court
- SH
- Case number
- W-05(SH)-356-08/2022 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
The Court upheld the High Court's factual findings: SP2 was credible and his observations supported inference of knowledge and joint possession. The appellants failed to rebut the presumption of distribution given the large quantity (977.4g) and joint presence; alleged third parties (John and Chinese man) were unproved and raised late, CCTV was absent per investigation, and there was no suppression of evidence by not calling other raid officers. Appellate interference was unwarranted absent clear error in the trial judge's evaluation.