Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments

ALFA LAGENDA SDN BHD Perbadanan PR1MA Malaysia

Citation

JA-24C(ARB)-1-01/2026 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

Court

ARB

Case number

JA-24C(ARB)-1-01/2026 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The application was dismissed because plaintiff failed mandatory procedural requirements (Aturan 29 service) and the strict duty of full disclosure for an ex parte order, and on the merits failed the injunction test: although a dispute exists it is suitable for arbitration, damages are an adequate remedy, and the balance of convenience favors the defendant; no clear fraud or unconscionability justified restraining payment under an on‑demand bond.

24 Feb 2020

1. QUANTUM PETROLEUM (M) SDN. BHD. 2. RALPH MICHEAL 1. MANIMARAN PERIASAMY 2. HO SEE KEONG 3. CLOUD DIGITAL TRADE IMPORT EXPORT SDN. BHD. 4. QUANTUM SUPREMO OIL (M) SDN. BHD. 5. NANO C VENTURES SDN. BHD. 6. NANO SDN. BHD. 7. QS LUBRICANT SD

Citation: WA-22IP-14-04/2017 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court: High Court
Case number: WA-22IP-14-04/2017 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The Ex Parte Anton Piller Order was set aside in its entirety because plaintiffs failed to show an extremely strong prima facie case, failed to identify alleged confidential information and IP rights, produced no evidence that defendants possessed relevant evidence, failed to show a real possibility of destruction or concealment, and the second plaintiff breached the confidentiality undertaking; notwithstanding setting aside, illegally obtained APO evidence is admissible at trial if relevant under the Evidence Act; second plaintiff guilty of two contempts fined RM10,000 (default 7 days); firs…