12 Apr 2022
WA-29NCC-1198-11/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Citation
- WA-29NCC-1198-11/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- WA-29NCC-1198-11/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Appeal allowed because the judgment creditor failed to obtain the mandatory leave required by Order 77 r.5(4) and Rule 89(4) before filing the second bankruptcy notice; the absence of prior leave rendered the filing procedurally defective and justified setting aside the SAR's decision and dismissing the JC's application, while other substantive objections raised by the JD were rejected.