1 Jul 2022
S2 – BK – B53KJ – 212 – 08/ 2019 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Citation
- S2 – BK – B53KJ – 212 – 08/ 2019 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Court
- Sessions Court
- Case number
- S2 – BK – B53KJ – 212 – 08/ 2019 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
On balance of probabilities the photographic evidence, debris location and investigating officer's findings supported the plaintiff's version that the collision occurred on the plaintiff's lawful path; the non-attendance of the eyewitness justified an adverse inference under s.114(g) Evidence Act 1950; there was no contributory negligence by the plaintiff; first defendant held 100% liable and plaintiff awarded damages and interest accordingly.