Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Topic

Expert valuation evidence

Legal area

Court

28 Oct 2022

CONCRETE IMPACT SDN BHD CONDOLINK SDN BHD

Citation

WA-22C-13-01/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

WA-22C-13-01/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

On the balance of probabilities the court found the Plaintiff completed the subcontract works by the end of EoT No.2 (15.5.2014); joint measurements and documentary evidence supported Plaintiff's quantities; Defendant failed to prove delay or establish entitlement to LAD; Plaintiff entitled to part of its claimed quantum after accepted deductions — RM171,254.41 plus interest and costs; Defendant's counterclaim for LAD dismissed.
25 Apr 2022

XXXX 1. ) XXXX 2. ) NOR ISMAN BIN ISMAIL 3. ) Rizal & Hafez (didakwa sebagai firma) 4. ) Thiano Limo Holdings Sdn Bhd 5. ) HONG LEONG BANK BERHAD

Citation

21NCVC-55-07/2013 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

21NCVC-55-07/2013 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

Where a wrongful transfer resulted in third‑party exploitation of the land, claimants are entitled to restitutionary damages under the user principle measured by the defendant's gains (rental income) less legitimate expenses; claimants must prove quantum with reliable evidence; expert valuation stands unless manifestly indefensible; bank is entitled to redemption sum with agreed interest once charge extinguished.