7 Jul 2025
MAJLIS BANDARAYA PULAU PINANG Sagamuda Civil Sdn Bhd
- Citation
- P-01(C)(W)-247-04/2024 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Court
- C
- Case number
- P-01(C)(W)-247-04/2024 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
The Court of Appeal held that the trial judge erred: the 2nd termination was valid because it was exercised under the parties' conditional reinstatement agreement which expressly allowed termination at any time; the CRA was not an EOT under the COC and did not set time at large; the respondent is estopped from treating the CRA as an EOT given its conduct and reapplication for EOTs; the respondent failed to dispute the Final Account within the contractual three‑month period so the Final Account is binding; consequently the AD is to be set aside and the employer’s claims (including LAD) are uph…