PUBLIC FINANCE BHD v PENKIN CREDIT & LEASING ADN BHD
- Citation
- PUBLIC FINANCE BHD v PENKIN CREDIT & LEASING ADN BHD
- Court
- Malaysian court
Because the defendants' affidavit failed to condescend upon particulars and did not clearly state facts supporting charged fraud/undue influence (which require particulars), and because the counterclaim was not a bona fide defence in nature, the defence was properly treated as sham/shadowy; conditional leave to defend was warranted subject to payment of the principal sum into Court within two months.