27 Aug 2025
Aliff Syukri bin Kamarzaman
- Citation
- BK-63-14-10/2022 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Court
- Sessions Court
- Case number
- BK-63-14-10/2022 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Although the prosecution established a prima facie case that the accused owned and administered the Instagram account and that the videos were indecent under MCMC/JAKIM guidelines (and that intention to annoy could be inferred), the court was bound by the Court of Appeal decision in Heidy Quah holding that the words 'offensive' and 'annoy' in s.233 CMA are unconstitutional; consequently the prosecution could not be maintained under that provision and the accused was acquitted and discharged.