26 Oct 2021
1. ) ENTIRAN A/L DURASAMY [NO KP: 930826085719] 2. ) GANESAN A/L DURASAMY [NO K/P: 901106085363] 3. ) VELMURUGAN A/L PANIRESILVAM [NO K/P: 830525087165] 4. ) GANESAN A/L KUPPUSAMY [NO K/P: 700217085293] 5. ) VINODH A/L SIVAKUMAR [NO KP: 920
- Citation
- AA-44-19-04/2021, AA-44-20-04/2021, AA-44-21-04/2021, AA-44-22-04/2021, AA-44-28-05/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- AA-44-19-04/2021, AA-44-20-04/2021, AA-44-21-04/2021, AA-44-22-04/2021, AA-44-28-05/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Section 13 SOSMA remains valid under Article 149 but must be read consistently with the equality guarantee in Article 8; the Court interprets the gendered term in Section 13(2)(b) so men are entitled to be considered for bail on a case-by-case basis; prior bail decisions did not resolve the equality issue (jurisdictional omission) and changed circumstances permit rehearing; accordingly the Court granted bail to each applicant with conditions including RM30,000 bond and mandatory Electronic Monitoring Device and other restrictions.