30 Oct 2023
Tarumacanan A/l Teagarajan [ ]
- Citation
- B-09(H)-159-04/2022 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Court
- H
- Case number
- B-09(H)-159-04/2022 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
Appeal dismissed because trial and appellate judges made concurrent credibility findings supported by the evidence; the defence that appellants attended to collect a debt was inherently improbable, inconsistently presented and not corroborated; non-production of the robbed items did not undermine the credible eyewitness testimony; no miscarriage of justice or error of law justified appellate interference.